Blog

The Trusted Source
Welcome to Blog Sign in | Join | Help
in Search

The Wild Side

Fish & Wildlife Depend on Hunting and Fishing

Responsible hunting and fishing is a safe and healthy activity that millions of Americans enjoy with their families each year. Hunting and fishing generates over 70 billion dollars annually and benefits all wildlife at every level. Revenue generated from hunting and fishing not only contributes to our nations economy, but to habitat acquisition, habitat protection, habitat improvement, wildlife research, refuge management, winter feeding programs, trap and transplant, clean water and much more.  Approximately 40 million Americans participate in hunting and fishing. The men, women and children who belong to credible conservation organizations and participate in hunting and fishing activities should be commended because they make the largest contributions to wildlife and habitat in America.

Wildlife management practices that utilize regulated hunting seasons with conservative bag limits are the sole reason we have healthy, plentiful wildlife populations in the United States today. The U.S. is a conservation role model recognized throughout the world. Hunters, fishers and conservation groups across America such as the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation, Ducks Unlimited, National Wild Turkey Federation, Pheasants Forever and all of their volunteers contribute far more money, resources and on the ground labor for fish, wildlife and habitat than the anti hunting groups such as the HSUS, or PETA ever have, or ever will. Not just game birds and game mammals benefit from these efforts; all living creatures including humans benefit from the work and dedication that our Nation’s conservation community provides.

We need to be very cautious not to make poor decisions regarding wildlife, farming, or pet ownership issues based on unscientific propaganda campaigns. The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), PETA and other similar groups want to end all responsible hunting and animal use in America. These extreme animal rights groups are against all animal use including hunting, fishing, trapping, farming, rodeo, pet breeding, riding horses, medical research, eating meat and more. They routinely use grotesque, disrespectful pictures and extreme verbiage such as “slaughter”, “blood sport”, “mutilation” and more for shock value and to grab attention. Since their mission is purely emotional and lacks scientific credibility, these groups are forced to stage scenes, play to children, wear costumes, protest aggressively, twist the truth and exploit rare and unfortunate mishaps in a disingenuous attempt to legitimize their cause.

Hunters, fishers, campers, birdwatchers, photographers and many others cherish wildlife and understand the importance of conservation and responsible animal use. In America, this should always be a free choice and should not be decided through legislation, or ballot initiatives. We need to be good stewards of the land and be free to take care of our valuable resources in the manner they deserve. Our wildlife depends on all of us to make good decisions based on science and leaving wildlife management in the hands of the professionals; not to a group of extremists with an agenda. Together, if we use teamwork and common sense we will continue to foster healthy, plentiful and well balanced fish and wildlife populations for our future generations to enjoy and be proud of.

Published Sunday, June 22, 2008 8:59 AM by Chad

Comments

 

Pal said:

Thank you, Chad for your well written post. Most people are unaware of the contribution we hunters make that, as you point out, everyone and all wildlife benefit from.

I would like to start a movement to stop using the term animal 'rights!' An old friend of mine, Vicki Hearne, once wrote eloquently about the absurd notion of rights without language. These groups of people have, in fact, no right to speak on behalf of animals. I think it fair for us to assume animals want the right to the survival of their species. That includes domestic animals. Following the ideology of these groups, it's not hard to see that this right would be lost to all animals through, for example, the forced sterilization of all dogs and the loss of habitat for wild animals.  

The ideology of these groups has more to do with despising human beings than it ever has had for the love of animals. They misrepresent the world by grossly exaggerating and fabricating lies to suite their purpose. Their huge coffers of money have never been used to end animal suffering or promote wildlife management. They are used to pay themselves high salaries and to pay lawyers to whittle away at the rights of law abiding citizens.  

June 30, 2008 5:11 AM
 

Chad said:

Sounds good, I suppose that brings us to the next step of the movement, issuing a name.

Got any ideas.......this should be fun because I have a few dandy's in mind..... ;)

June 30, 2008 4:26 PM
 

Arrowhead said:

RE: Pal

You wrote that "everyone and all wildlife benefit" from the contributions hunters make.  How do the animals that are killed benefit from your actions?  

August 3, 2008 11:37 AM
 

LLk said:

Well, the hunter of course benefits from the meat to eat.  The animals benefit from not starving to death from starvation and from over-population.  The environment also benefits because it is not being overgrazed and destroyed.  All parties benefit from the money brought in from the hunters who support and have supported for many many years the environment that the animals live in.  It is because of them that we have something left to manage.  I don't hunt or fish myself just because I don't have the opportunity anymore, but I do have great respect for those that do and contribute to proper wildlife management.  I think death from a hunters bullet is much kinder than that from a slow starvation or being eaten by other prediators who won't kill them as quickly.

August 5, 2008 11:51 AM
 

sch2537 said:

Re:  Arrowhead

Hunters are one of the largest contributers to Concervation funds.  This results in more land for future generations of animals.  Also, hunting licenses pay for out state and federal lands ie the animals have a place to live.  This also allows for all of us humans to be able to enjoy nature and later donate funds to help create more preserves etc.  Thats the beautiful cycle of life!  I find it strange that PETA is so against hunting.  If they really cared about the animals they would want to promote hunting.    How about PETA donate all the billions it raises from the mindless masses to The Nature Concervancy!  That would actually help animals!  It would also help the average IQ of the human population by releasing the mindless PETA drones to be enlightened and actually enjoy nature and animals.  Personally, I think that PETA members are just directionless and like drama.

August 6, 2008 5:02 AM
Anonymous comments are disabled

This Blog

Syndication

Tags

No tags have been created or used yet.

Archives