Blog

The Trusted Source
Welcome to Blog Sign in | Join | Help
in Search

The Wild Side

Is Your Lifestyle In Jeopardy?



PETA and the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) present the largest threat to the animal use groups in our country today. PETA and the HSUS are NOT your local animal shelters. These organizations are well funded, highly political and want to shut down a wide array of animal use activities including hunting, fishing, horse/dog racing, rodeo, medical research, farming, ranching, field trials, dog breeding, dog shows and more. They routinely utilize their multi million dollar budgets picketing, introducing legislation and ballot initiatives to force their agenda. These groups are against meat consumption and the use of animal products such as leather and fur. They promote a vegan lifestyle with campaigns utilizing children, websites and national media attention. These groups have no respect for American rights, freedoms and traditions where animal use is concerned. If you really want to donate to help animals and support responsible animal use, give directly to your local animal shelter, N.A.I.A., or join a credible conservation organization that works for wildlife.
Published Thursday, June 19, 2008 1:36 PM by Chad

Comments

 

sch2537 said:

I like NAIA, the Nature Concervancy and something for petsand people like Canine Companions for Independence.

August 6, 2008 5:04 AM
 

Crozbo217 said:

im on Peta2 and i think i prefer NAIA its like peta just 100X less extreme

September 28, 2008 11:55 AM
 

Maggie said:

It is hard to know who can be trusted.  Web sites can lend legitimacy to anyone that is capable of building one.  Not knowing for sure who the players are makes it difficult to know whom to support.  I go by the idea that first I look at their ideas and actions.  Then I join and look at the posts they send me.  Most of the things I've read on this site I agree with except the mandatory microchipping idea.  I oppose any surgical proceedure mandated by government on my animals.  I feel the decision about surgical proceedures should be between the animal's owner and their professional health care provider.  

While we have a flurry of different groups all opposing the animal rights groups they are combining their groups into single entities making them more powerful entities.  We have to become a huge cohesive voting bloc if we hope to defeat them.  

For decades animal rights individuals have been positioning themselves - I believe through the rescue communities primarily to start but their may be other areas as well.  They are now implimenting their long sought agendas.  It didn't happen over night.  If we wish the pendulum to swing the other way we have to start now and unite with some banner.  

I take this approach, find out what my enemy is doing right and then mimic them.  If it's working I use it in so far as I'm able without their financial resources.  

I can tell you for sure no one cares about dog breeders.  No one cares about chicken producers or cattle farmers.  And animal activists don't care about presenting a realistic rounded position of truth.  They use emotional appeals to gain followers that "feel they know the truth".  Labeling yourself an animal welfare group would appeal to the "feelers".    But if dog breeders, chicken breeders, cattle farmers, etc would unite as a single entity we would be like AARP.  So huge we could not be politically denied our rights of animal ownership.

November 22, 2008 5:13 AM
Anonymous comments are disabled

This Blog

Syndication

Tags

No tags have been created or used yet.

Archives