An economic study on California's Treatment of Farm Animals Act was recently conducted by the United Egg Producers and the Pacific Egg & Poultry Association. Conclusions were disheartening:
- $615 million loss in state economic activity
- 3,400 jobs lost by 2015
- loss of $18.5 million in state tax revenue
- higher prices for consumers
Doesn't sound good for egg producers and low-income consumers, does it? Yet it had no problem getting on this November's ballot: HSUS reports that 790,486 Californians signed petitions in support of this ballot initiative.
If the dire implications of the study are true, why would so many people -- especially in today's economy -- willingly sign such petitions?
Could it be that egg producers are suffering from some sort of image problem?